Kukhim Cheon Ha-ram “If Kim Tae-woo is nominated as a candidate for the head of Gangseo-gu, the leadership will be ruined”


Cheon Ha-ram, chairman of the People’s Power Suncheon Gap Party Committee, said on the 16th that the former head of Gangseo-gu, Kim Tae-woo (pictured), who was convicted of leaking official secrets and was recently pardoned, said, “If nominated again, the current leadership will be ruined.” said.

Chairman Cheon appeared on CBS Radio’s ‘Kim Hyun-jung’s News Show’ that day and said, “I really want to believe that I will not be sent to the head of Gangseo-gu again this time (October by-election).”

He said, “In the October election스포츠토토, the head of Gangseo-gu will be a gauge that accurately shows the voters in the metropolitan area in the future.” He predicted, “We are running with an enormous sand bag, but if the score difference is large and we lose, how will the current leadership survive, so I don’t think it will be possible.”

Instead, he said, “Maybe I’m going to get beaten up now and guide the by-election for the mayor and move on a bit to make (former mayor Kim) in the next general election.” “Isn’t it the paving stone of the 19th, so I think it was (pardoned) a little earlier,” he emphasized.

Chairman Cheon stated that strategic nominations were inappropriate when former mayor Kim ran for the general election, and said, “I don’t think it’s very good (running for the general election) because I think the amnesty is inappropriate in the first place, but if I run for the general election, how can I stop it?”

Former district chief Kim negatively evaluated the fact that he was pardoned three months after the sentence was confirmed by the Supreme Court. He said, “We always emphasize the rule of law, but I honestly don’t think it’s a little bit whether (amnesty) matches the attitude of our conservative party or the attitude of the Yoon Seok-yeol government.” Then, he pointed out, “If we had pardoned a righteous person at the time of the Moon Jae-in administration within three months of the Supreme Court’s final decision, would we have stayed still?”

On the other hand, Chairman Chun responded to former CEO Lee Jun-seok’s statement that “if there is a clear sign of playing around with nominations, you can take other actions.” It’s there, but I’m listening to it by itself.” He also insisted, “If you look at the messages coming out these days, there are a lot of messages like ‘Yoo Seung-min doesn’t work, but Lee Jun-seok does’.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *